<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Inside Legal Economics — Weekly Briefings</title>
    <link>https://economicsoflaw.com</link>
    <atom:link href="https://economicsoflaw.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Legal Economics intelligence for law-firm and legal-department leaders, by Inside Practice.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:13:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>The Market Moves issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-10-08</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-10-08</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-10-08 · 8 October 2026

This week’s legal-economics signals point to a market that is still expanding, but becoming harder to measure and more demanding to manage. Employment reached a new high and firms continued to pursue scale, specialist talent and leadership capacity, while Kirkland’s withdrawal from voluntary financial reporting reduced transparency at the top of the market. At the same time, clients are applying AI directly to invoice scrutiny and firms are finding that operational efficiency has moved faster than pricing reform. For law-firm leaders, the near-term priority is to connect growth decisions to verifiable matter economics, rather than relying on headline demand, rate strength or technology adoption alone.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-10-08.jpg" length="122652" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-10-08.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="122652" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Compensation &amp; Talent Economics issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-10-01</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-10-01</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-10-01 · 1 October 2026

Transaction activity is still producing substantial advisory revenue, but the operating model beneath that revenue is changing quickly. Clients are pressing firms to convert AI productivity into lower or more predictable fees, while firms are absorbing new technology, talent and governance costs. At the same time, partnership tiers, recruiting practices and outside-capital structures are being redesigned to retain capability and fund growth. For law firm leaders, the immediate priority is to connect pricing, investment and talent decisions to matter-level economics rather than treat them as separate initiatives.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-10-01.jpg" length="143105" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-10-01.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="143105" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Pricing &amp; AFAs issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-24</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-24</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-09-24 · 24 September 2026

This week’s developments show legal-sector growth colliding with rising capital, talent and technology costs. UK legal exports reached a record level, but firms and legal-finance providers are simultaneously making larger bets on specialist partners, refinancing and AI platforms whose commercial returns still require disciplined measurement. Outside investment structures also face tighter boundaries, while lower model prices increase pressure to distinguish computing savings from fully loaded delivery savings. For law-firm leaders, the operating question is shifting from whether to invest to how to connect investment, pricing, matter economics and institutional resilience.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-24.jpg" length="151795" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-24.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="151795" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Technology &amp; AI Economics issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-17</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-17</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-09-17 · 17 September 2026

Law-firm economics this week are being shaped less by a single demand shock than by a widening set of operating bets. Firms are committing capital to proprietary AI infrastructure, hiring finance and technology executives, and buying teams in growth practices while pricing evidence begins to show that AI can raise matter profitability only when the commercial model captures the efficiency. The same market remains labor-intensive: U.S. legal employment reached another record even as a large lawyer study linked the longest workweeks to materially higher stress. For firm leaders, the immediate task is to connect technology and lateral investment to matter-level returns rather than treating scale, hours or adoption as sufficient evidence of value.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-17.jpg" length="152411" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-17.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="152411" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Market Moves issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-10</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-10</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-09-10 · 10 September 2026

Law-firm demand remains stronger than the profession&apos;s historical baseline, but the economic architecture around that demand is becoming less predictable. During the week of September 3–10, resilient billable hours sat alongside pressure to share AI savings, forecasts of consumption-based software costs, and two sharply different capital strategies: buying proprietary infrastructure or relying on heavily funded platforms. Talent economics also moved beyond salary alone, with new burnout evidence and mixed trainee-retention results pointing to the cost of capacity and supervision. This nine-story edition does not add a tenth item because the remaining in-window coverage was either duplicative or too weakly connected to law-firm economics. For firm leaders, the immediate priority is to connect pricing, technology procurement, talent management and conflicts controls to matter-level profitability rather than manage them as separate functions.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-10.jpg" length="141212" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-10.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="141212" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The realization-gap issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-03</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-09-03</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-09-03 · 3 September 2026

The first half of 2026 delivered the strongest law firm revenue performance in years, with Am Law 200 aggregate revenue up 12.4% and net income surging 17.5%, yet the numbers obscure a deepening structural tension: headline rate growth is outpacing realized collections, AI is compressing the hours that once justified those rates, and associate compensation reset to a new market floor in July — adding a cost layer that directly pressures margins heading into the second half. The demand story remains exceptional — logged hours grew 4.8%, well above historical averages — but the engines driving that demand are almost entirely transactional, leaving firms exposed if M&amp;A conditions soften. Underneath the record results, three fault lines are widening simultaneously: a realization gap, a billing-model credibility problem accelerated by AI efficiency, and an escalating talent-cost cycle. The firms that manage all three coherently will separate from those still reading their H1 revenue numbers as a signal to coast.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-03.jpg" length="112776" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-09-03.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="112776" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The efficiency-dividend issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-27</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-27</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-08-27 · 27 August 2026

The first half of 2026 has produced the strongest law firm revenue numbers in at least a decade, with double-digit gains confirmed by three independent surveys in a single week. Wells Fargo&apos;s Legal Specialty Group put large-firm revenue growth at 12.4%, Citi&apos;s Law Firm Group landed at 11.7%, and the Thomson Reuters Law Firm Financial Index recorded its sharpest single-quarter gain of the year in Q2. Beneath the headline numbers, the picture is more complicated: AI spending is the fastest-growing overhead category, realized rates are compressing even as standard rates rise, and collection cycles are slowing as clients push back on the economics of an hourly model they increasingly view as misaligned with AI-enabled delivery. The H2 question is whether collections catch up, or whether the efficiency dividend continues to accrue to firms rather than to clients — a dynamic that is sharpening pressure for structural pricing reform.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-27.jpg" length="105491" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-27.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="105491" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The forward-cost-base issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-20</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-20</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-08-20 · 20 August 2026

Law firms are running the hottest economic engine since 2021 — but the exhaust is getting expensive. The Citi H1 2026 report, published August 17, confirms 11.7% revenue growth and a rare 4.2% demand surge driven by mega-deal M&amp;A and sustained litigation, while expenses rose nearly as fast at 9.7%, with AI investment and compensation scale resets eating into margin gains. The Q2 Thomson Reuters LFFI reinforces a dual-track industry: Am Law 100 firms are generating operating leverage, while Midsize firms continue to see profit per FTE slip below the pace of cost growth. For CFOs and pricing teams, the critical question heading into H2 is whether the demand surge will hold long enough to absorb the forward cost base that firms have committed to.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-20.jpg" length="93820" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-20.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="93820" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The widening-segment-gap issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-13</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-13</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-08-13 · 13 August 2026

The US law firm market entered mid-August 2026 carrying its strongest demand momentum since 2021, yet the economic picture is splitting along structural lines: equity partner hours are declining as leverage deepens, salary costs are ratcheting up on Milbank&apos;s new scale, entry-level hiring has posted its steepest drop in a decade, and a wave of historic mergers is reshaping the competitive landscape before the year&apos;s end. Beneath the strong top-line numbers — Thomson Reuters reporting demand up 3% year-over-year and billing rates climbing 7.1% in Q2 — the AI fee-arrangement question is crystallizing into a genuine strategic decision point. Firms deployed at scale are quietly capturing AI efficiency as margin rather than passing it to clients, while roughly 60 AmLaw 200 firms stuck in extended pilot are bearing platform costs without the throughput to justify the investment. The gap between segments is the widest it has been since late 2022, and this time large firms are gaining ground while midsize firms continue to falter.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-13.jpg" length="96370" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-13.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="96370" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The peak-extraction issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-06</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-08-06</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-08-06 · 6 August 2026

The Am Law 100 just completed its most profitable year in the industry&apos;s recorded history — $179 billion in gross revenue, up 13%, with average profit per equity partner at $3.59 million, up 14%, and Kirkland &amp; Ellis the first firm to cross $10 billion — and the profession immediately produced two reports that explain why that headline number is less stable than it looks. PwC&apos;s new legal market analysis found that 22% of fee income is in categories where sophisticated clients are ready to self-serve with AI, and that firms collectively expect AI to unlock efficiency gains equal to 16% of chargeable hours in 2026 — up from 11% in 2025 — while only a minority have yet converted that activity into monetisable gain. Unbiased Consulting&apos;s parallel analysis went further, arguing that the billable hour question is the wrong one: the real disruption is the leverage model, and the data show that hourly billing is expected to fall from 72% to 44% of work within two to three years. Against that backdrop, entry-level hiring at firms with 500+ lawyers declined 7.5% in 2025 — the first drop in more than a decade — while Q2 lateral partner hiring continued at record volume and 75% of hires came from within the Am Law 200 itself. The week&apos;s economic picture is one of a profession extracting maximum value from the existing model while the structural foundations beneath it shift faster than partner-compensation systems can adapt.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-06.jpg" length="119767" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-08-06.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="119767" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The efficiency paradox issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-30</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-30</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-07-30 · 30 July 2026

The efficiency paradox is no longer theoretical. Unbiased Consulting named it directly this week: &quot;The reaction is one of euphoria and bewilderment, because at the very moment they celebrate the efficiency gain, their own firm&apos;s billing system is telling them they&apos;ve just lost 11.5 hours of revenue.&quot; Law firms are simultaneously posting record financial results — Clifford Chance: £2.6bn revenue, £2.3M PEP; Brodies: £138.8M, 11% growth, sixteenth consecutive year — while confronting the structural reality that AI adoption under hourly billing is a revenue compression mechanism, not a revenue growth mechanism. The week&apos;s economic data points tell the full story: mid-law revenue up 13% in H1, billing rates up 11.4%, but clients waiting 60–90 days to pay; 62% of GCs expect AI to reduce billable hours; and Clio&apos;s 2026 data shows most small firms that adopted AI changed nothing about their pricing and saw no revenue growth as a result. The firms that resolved the paradox in 2025 are reporting the results in 2026. The firms still inside it are generating the data that explains the gap.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-30.jpg" length="124466" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-30.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="124466" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The AI dividend issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-23</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-23</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-07-23 · 23 July 2026

The AI efficiency dividend is now the central pricing dispute in legal services. Law firms are posting record financial results — billing rates, profits per equity partner (PEP), and revenues all climbing — while clients increasingly ask where the AI-driven cost reductions are. A week of simultaneous record UK firm results and granular pricing survey data has crystallized the question: firms are capturing the AI dividend, but clients are not yet seeing it. The gap between AI productivity claims and client-visible pricing changes is the defining tension of the 2026 legal market.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-23.jpg" length="102520" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-23.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="102520" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The AI-financed rate cycle issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-16</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-16</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-07-16 · 16 July 2026

The week&apos;s dominant economic signal is the tension between what AI is supposed to do to law firm pricing and what law firm financial data actually shows. Deloitte Legal&apos;s AI Imperative report has crystallized the client-side expectation: 78% of GCs want AI-driven cost reductions, hourly work is projected to fall from 72% to 44% of fees within two to three years, and external legal spend could contract by 20–40% over the next three years if firms and clients collaborate to capture AI efficiency. Against that expectation, the 8am SMB Law Financial Health Report — analyzing several million bills issued by MyCase customers from April 2024 to March 2026 — found that hours billed per case went up in nearly every practice area tracked: 3–7% in most areas, 32% in bankruptcy. Billing rates followed: $262 to $274 per billed hour, a 4.4% rise. Wells Fargo&apos;s Legal Specialty Group confirmed the dynamic from the large-firm side: Q1 revenue at AmLaw 50 firms up more than 13%, driven almost entirely by 11% higher rates, while collections slowed 6.5 days and receivables piled up fastest at the very top of the market. The practical economics for law firm CFOs and pricing teams this week: AI is not yet producing a pricing pivot — it is currently financing a rate increase cycle. The firms that will win the next three years are those who use AI efficiency to build the pricing infrastructure (outcome models, fixed-phase structures, AFA frameworks) that clients are already demanding, before the client-side pressure becomes a procurement constraint.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-16.jpg" length="128476" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-16.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="128476" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The consolidation-in-execution issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-02</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-07-02</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-07-02 · 2 July 2026

The week closed the second quarter with the legal industry&apos;s structural M&amp;A wave crossing into execution — Ashurst Perkins Coie and Hogan Lovells Cadwalader both went live within days of each other, cementing a consolidation logic driven as much by rising technology and talent costs as by growth ambition. Beneath the merger headlines, the Second Hundred&apos;s 2025 results confirmed a widening profitability gap with the Am Law 100, one that analysts now tie directly to which firms can afford large-scale AI investment. On pricing, commentary intensified around whether AI-driven efficiency gains will be captured by firms as margin or passed through to clients as savings, with fresh reporting suggesting most firms have yet to decide — or even measure the return on what they are spending. Associate compensation kept climbing as boutiques outpaced BigLaw&apos;s own raises, adding further cost pressure just as demand growth signals begin to soften.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-02.jpg" length="159947" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-07-02.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="159947" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The bifurcation issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-29</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-29</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-06-29 · 29 June 2026

The week&apos;s defining tension: law firm revenue is at historic highs — AmLaw 100 Q1 2026 revenue up 13.1% year-over-year, median partner rates crossing $1,000/hour for the first time — yet the economics underneath are bifurcating fast. AI is compressing commodity billing while inflating judgment-layer rates, uncollected fees are growing at nearly 17%, and in-house legal spend as a percentage of revenue just hit a six-year low. Firms that can name which layer of work they actually sell are beginning to separate from those that cannot.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-29.jpg" length="103805" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-29.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="103805" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The alignment issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-18</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-18</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-06-18 · 18 June 2026

Run date: 2026-06-18</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-18.jpg" length="105542" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-18.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="105542" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The MSO and compensation cascade issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-11</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-11</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-06-11 · 11 June 2026

Run date: 2026-06-11</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-11.jpg" length="142408" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-11.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="142408" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Am Law 100 final results issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-04</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-06-04</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-06-04 · 4 June 2026

Run date: 2026-06-04</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-04.jpg" length="115634" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-06-04.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="115634" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The midsize and transatlantic issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-28</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-28</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-05-28 · 28 May 2026

Run date: 2026-05-28</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-28.jpg" length="130087" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-28.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="130087" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The UK signal and the churn problem issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-21</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-21</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-05-21 · 21 May 2026

Internal briefing for Inside Practice. Source rule: original/source links only.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-21.jpg" length="137323" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-21.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="137323" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The buyer pushback issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-14</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-14</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-05-14 · 14 May 2026

This week’s legal economics signal is a market at the top of the rate cycle trying to decide whether AI, client pressure and consolidation will reinforce pricing power or expose its limits. The strongest sources point to the same commercial tension: law firms are still profitable, but clients are becoming more data-led, more willing to move work and more focused on whether value can be proven before the invoice arrives.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-14.jpg" length="103816" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-14.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="103816" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Am Law 100 scale issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-07</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-05-07</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-05-07 · 7 May 2026

Internal briefing for Inside Practice on law-firm financial strategy, pricing, AFAs, the billable hour, compensation, consolidation, procurement and legal spend benchmarks.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-07.jpg" length="103394" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-05-07.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="103394" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The fault lines issue</title>
      <link>https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-04-30</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://economicsoflaw.com/briefings/2026-04-30</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Weekly Briefing</category>
      <description>Weekly Briefing · 2026-04-30 · 30 April 2026

Internal briefing for Inside Practice Coverage window: Baseline run through April 30, 2026 Source rule: original publisher, research-owner, company or primary-source links only.</description>
      <enclosure url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-04-30.jpg" length="109131" type="image/jpeg" />
      <media:content url="https://economicsoflaw.com/briefing-covers/2026-04-30.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" fileSize="109131" />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
